Featured Post

A Comparison Of Machiavelli And Hobbes Politics Essay

A Comparison Of Machiavelli And Hobbes Politics Essay Machiavelli and Hobbes were the most significant political savants of early innovat...

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Business Communication for International Rights- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theBusiness Communication for International Human Rights. Answer: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The above mentioned statement is given under the article 19(1) (a) of the Article found in part III of United Nations Constitution , Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It should be noted that every human being has nature and desires to do things and seek information about things in the environment. Thus, the above mentioned rights talks about the rights and responsibility of one individual to other to provide the equal right of information and initiate activities which they want to perform in the environment. A man in the environment is free to do activities which they desire to do, but such activities should not harm the interest of any other person present in the environment. It should be noted that the right given under this article is good for the people prevailing in the environment but can also be misused by people in order to succeed in their cruel intentions (Freeman 2017). Talking about the scope of this right, it should be noted that this right gives opportunity to all citizens to attain the right to freedom of speech and expression. Freedom of speech and expression refers to the right to express ones own feelings and opinions freely without facing any restrictions. This right helps a person in attaining self-fulfillment, discover truths, participate in decision-making, oppose to notions which they do not like and lastly form their own beliefs and communicate freely and openly. With the changing environment, the mind of people is also changing their way of thinking and expressing things. So, also with positive aspects there are many negative ways to use this freedom of expression. Initially talking about the positive aspects it should be noted that this right helps people in acknowledging their rights which can access and use them as well (O'Reilly 2016). People living in remote area do not have the knowledge about their rights and duties which they p ossess, so this right will provide them the opportunity to access information about their right and responsibilities of societies towards them. Further, this right also holds accountability in front of the democratic government as with the help of this right, a person can easily question the government about their future goals and activities. So, basically this right of freedom of expression is the basic right which helps a person in living their life easily (Joseph 2016). Criticizing the event, it should be noted that there are many ways in which this right can be misused by people present in the environment. Like, a person under the right to freedom of expression can seek information from the governmental for the future actions which they are going to initiate can hamper the future activities of the government (Spring 2014). A person attain such information can be a friend of alien company which can negatively affect the interest of the country also. Further, it should also be noted that people also misinterpret the right which is given to them under this section; they believe that they can express anything irrespective of the harm which other person can get with their expression (Buergenthal, Shelton, Stewart, and Vazquez 2017). But it should be noted that no right is absolute as every right has a corresponding duty. Thus, right to speech for a person can be restricted if their aim is to defame the name of any person or organization. Also, this righ t can be restricted from a person under public interest order, as if anything disturbs public tranquility or public peace then the government has the right to issue public order against it (Lupu 2015). Thus, in the limelight of above mentioned events it should be noted that the right of freedom and expression is an important which should be availed by every person irrespective of their country, religion or sex. This right gives the opportunity to people to speak freely and express in their wishful manner. But this right also restricts the activities of people if they are initiated against the decency and morality of any other person or artificial body. References Buergenthal, T., Shelton, D., Stewart, D. and Vazquez, C., 2017. International human rights in a nutshell. West Academic. Freeman, M., 2017.Human rights. John Wiley Sons. Joseph, S., 2016. Civil and political rights. InInternational Human Rights Law(pp. 105-122). Routledge. Lupu, Y., 2015. Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), pp.578-594. O'Reilly, A., 2016. In Defence of Offence: Freedom of Expression, Offensive Speech, and the Approach of the European Court of Human Rights.Trinity CL Rev.,19, p.234. Spring, J., 2014.Globalization and educational rights: An intercivilizational analysis. Routledge.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.